<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 932 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758688</link>
    <description>SC dismissed civil appeal, ruling that appellant&#039;s activities did not constitute &quot;horticulture activity&quot; and were correctly covered under Finance Act, 1994 Sections 65(64) and 65(105)(zzg). The show cause notice was upheld as valid. The appeal was found without merit, and all related applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 13:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=768727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 932 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758688</link>
      <description>SC dismissed civil appeal, ruling that appellant&#039;s activities did not constitute &quot;horticulture activity&quot; and were correctly covered under Finance Act, 1994 Sections 65(64) and 65(105)(zzg). The show cause notice was upheld as valid. The appeal was found without merit, and all related applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>