<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 942 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758698</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the demand for differential duty was time-barred and unsustainable due to the absence of evidence for improper declaration or suppression of facts. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of fraudulent intent by the Appellant and granted any consequential relief in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 07:53:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=768717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 942 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758698</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the demand for differential duty was time-barred and unsustainable due to the absence of evidence for improper declaration or suppression of facts. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of fraudulent intent by the Appellant and granted any consequential relief in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>