<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 960 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758716</link>
    <description>ITAT Kolkata allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal partly, deleting additions made u/s 68 for unexplained credits. The tribunal found that amounts were legitimate business payments to contractors with proper documentation including TDS certificates and accountant certifications. For trading liabilities, additions were deleted where the assessee provided adequate evidence, but for two parties where documentation was insufficient due to damaged records, the addition was restricted to 50% of the original amount assessed by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 07:53:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=768699" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 960 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758716</link>
      <description>ITAT Kolkata allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal partly, deleting additions made u/s 68 for unexplained credits. The tribunal found that amounts were legitimate business payments to contractors with proper documentation including TDS certificates and accountant certifications. For trading liabilities, additions were deleted where the assessee provided adequate evidence, but for two parties where documentation was insufficient due to damaged records, the addition was restricted to 50% of the original amount assessed by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758716</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>