<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 975 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758731</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner, an agriculturist, challenging tax demand notices under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that the petitioner should have filed a rectification petition under Section 154 before approaching the court. The petitioner was granted 30 days to file the rectification petition. No costs were awarded, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 15:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=768684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 975 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758731</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner, an agriculturist, challenging tax demand notices under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that the petitioner should have filed a rectification petition under Section 154 before approaching the court. The petitioner was granted 30 days to file the rectification petition. No costs were awarded, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>