<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1004 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758760</link>
    <description>Refund processing was directed to proceed on the respondent&#039;s statement that the refund application would be decided within two weeks. The petitioner was granted liberty to complete any required formalities, and any delay in intimating or complying with those formalities was stated not to obstruct the refund claim. The disposal thus preserved the refund request while ensuring procedural compliance could be completed without defeating substantive relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 12:29:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=768655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1004 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758760</link>
      <description>Refund processing was directed to proceed on the respondent&#039;s statement that the refund application would be decided within two weeks. The petitioner was granted liberty to complete any required formalities, and any delay in intimating or complying with those formalities was stated not to obstruct the refund claim. The disposal thus preserved the refund request while ensuring procedural compliance could be completed without defeating substantive relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>