https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457338 A second FIR concerning the same transaction is impermissible, even though further investigation arising from that transaction may continue. On a prima facie comparison, the later complaint was said to overlap with an earlier FIR involving the same loan accounts and borrower group, so interim protection against coercive action was considered necessary to safeguard personal liberty while the petitions remained pending. The investigation was nevertheless allowed to proceed. en-us Fri, 13 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Sep 2024 20:36:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457338 A second FIR concerning the same transaction is impermissible, even though further investigation arising from that transaction may continue. On a prima facie comparison, the later complaint was said to overlap with an earlier FIR involving the same loan accounts and borrower group, so interim protection against coercive action was considered necessary to safeguard personal liberty while the petitions remained pending. The investigation was nevertheless allowed to proceed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457338