<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 1203 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457339</link>
    <description>The Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 prescribes a special procedure for criminal action arising from audit findings, including a report to the Registrar and written permission before an FIR is filed. The Court noted that the FIR was founded on material traced to a test audit that had been stayed, and held that the prosecution could not be sustained by relabelling that material as a mere inspection report. It further stated that the general rule governing cognizable offences could not override the Act&#039;s specific initiation mechanism. The impugned criminal action was therefore treated as contrary to the statutory mandate and liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 20:36:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=768638" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 1203 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457339</link>
      <description>The Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 prescribes a special procedure for criminal action arising from audit findings, including a report to the Registrar and written permission before an FIR is filed. The Court noted that the FIR was founded on material traced to a test audit that had been stayed, and held that the prosecution could not be sustained by relabelling that material as a mere inspection report. It further stated that the general rule governing cognizable offences could not override the Act&#039;s specific initiation mechanism. The impugned criminal action was therefore treated as contrary to the statutory mandate and liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>