https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457343 In non-bailable offences, bail discretion must be exercised judicially by weighing the seriousness of the accusation, the punishment, the evidence, and the risk of witness interference. The text notes that nearly seven years of custody, absence of charge-framing, and no realistic prospect of timely trial completion supported release pending trial. It also treats parity as relevant, since similarly placed co-accused had already obtained regular or anticipatory bail, and the trial record still required transfer and translation, making prompt conclusion uncertain. Bail was granted subject to conditions, reflecting the balance between liberty and trial safeguards. en-us Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Sep 2024 20:36:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457343 In non-bailable offences, bail discretion must be exercised judicially by weighing the seriousness of the accusation, the punishment, the evidence, and the risk of witness interference. The text notes that nearly seven years of custody, absence of charge-framing, and no realistic prospect of timely trial completion supported release pending trial. It also treats parity as relevant, since similarly placed co-accused had already obtained regular or anticipatory bail, and the trial record still required transfer and translation, making prompt conclusion uncertain. Bail was granted subject to conditions, reflecting the balance between liberty and trial safeguards. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457343