<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 2182 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457346</link>
    <description>Duty demand on scrap generated at job workers&#039; premises during processing of raw materials for a principal manufacturer could not be sustained because the dispute was covered by earlier decisions in the assessee&#039;s own case for prior periods. The Tribunal followed that binding line of authority and set aside the demand, with consequential relief. Duty, interest and penalty were annulled on the same facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2024 14:15:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=768631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 2182 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457346</link>
      <description>Duty demand on scrap generated at job workers&#039; premises during processing of raw materials for a principal manufacturer could not be sustained because the dispute was covered by earlier decisions in the assessee&#039;s own case for prior periods. The Tribunal followed that binding line of authority and set aside the demand, with consequential relief. Duty, interest and penalty were annulled on the same facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457346</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>