<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1698 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457353</link>
    <description>An assessment order passed pursuant to notice under section 142(1) of the Income-tax Act was held unsustainable because the assessee was not given an effective hearing and its reply was not duly considered. The breach of natural justice meant the order could not stand. The matter was remitted for fresh consideration, with direction to pass a speaking order after properly dealing with the representation already filed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 20:36:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=768624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1698 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457353</link>
      <description>An assessment order passed pursuant to notice under section 142(1) of the Income-tax Act was held unsustainable because the assessee was not given an effective hearing and its reply was not duly considered. The breach of natural justice meant the order could not stand. The matter was remitted for fresh consideration, with direction to pass a speaking order after properly dealing with the representation already filed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>