https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457336 Review jurisdiction is exceptional and must be exercised sparingly; it cannot be used to reargue the same issues, revive rejected submissions, or obtain a second hearing on concluded matters. Interference is justified only where there is a glaring omission, patent mistake, or other grave error showing judicial fallibility, while minor or inconsequential errors do not warrant reconsideration. Finality of the earlier order remains a material consideration, and a counsel's certificate is not a routine basis for re-litigation. The review petition was held not maintainable on the grounds urged and was dismissed. en-us Thu, 13 Mar 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Sep 2024 16:33:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457336 Review jurisdiction is exceptional and must be exercised sparingly; it cannot be used to reargue the same issues, revive rejected submissions, or obtain a second hearing on concluded matters. Interference is justified only where there is a glaring omission, patent mistake, or other grave error showing judicial fallibility, while minor or inconsequential errors do not warrant reconsideration. Finality of the earlier order remains a material consideration, and a counsel's certificate is not a routine basis for re-litigation. The review petition was held not maintainable on the grounds urged and was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 13 Mar 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457336