https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457334 Bail was granted to a petitioner in custody in connection with a fake encounter case because he had remained detained for about three years and ten months, was not named as an accused in the original charge-sheet, had been described by the CBI as a witness, and no evidence of complicity had emerged during investigation. On those facts, the SC held that he deserved to be enlarged on bail, subject to furnishing the specified bail bond and sureties. en-us Fri, 02 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Sep 2024 12:56:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457334 Bail was granted to a petitioner in custody in connection with a fake encounter case because he had remained detained for about three years and ten months, was not named as an accused in the original charge-sheet, had been described by the CBI as a witness, and no evidence of complicity had emerged during investigation. On those facts, the SC held that he deserved to be enlarged on bail, subject to furnishing the specified bail bond and sureties. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 02 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457334