<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 1257 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457335</link>
    <description>A successive bail application under Section 439 CrPC can be entertained only where there is a real and material change in circumstances; absent such change, the request is not maintainable. The Court held that reliance on remarks in the charge sheet did not amount to a new factual basis, because questions of involvement and evidentiary appraisal after filing of the charge sheet must be decided by the competent court. The earlier bail rejection had already considered the applicant&#039;s arraignment, presence at the scene, and prima facie role, and no fresh circumstance justified reconsideration. The successive bail application was therefore rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 12:56:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=768575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 1257 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457335</link>
      <description>A successive bail application under Section 439 CrPC can be entertained only where there is a real and material change in circumstances; absent such change, the request is not maintainable. The Court held that reliance on remarks in the charge sheet did not amount to a new factual basis, because questions of involvement and evidentiary appraisal after filing of the charge sheet must be decided by the competent court. The earlier bail rejection had already considered the applicant&#039;s arraignment, presence at the scene, and prima facie role, and no fresh circumstance justified reconsideration. The successive bail application was therefore rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>