<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reassessment Invalid: Tribunal Rules No New Evidence Justifies Reopening Under Tax Law, Citing Supreme Court Precedent.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81417</link>
    <description>The crux of the matter revolves around the validity of reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer (AO). The critical issue is whether there existed any new &#039;tangible material&#039; or fresh &#039;information&#039; in the possession of the AO to justify reopening the assessment u/s 147 of the Act. The Tribunal, after examining the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment in Kelvinator of India Ltd. and the assessee&#039;s own case, concluded that there was no new &#039;tangible material&#039; or fresh &#039;information&#039; available with the AO. Consequently, the Tribunal held that if the AO assumes jurisdiction u/s 147 without such material or information, it would render the reassessment proceedings a nullity, liable to be set aside. Additionally, the Tribunal noted that the .....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 08:37:06 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 08:37:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=768524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Reassessment Invalid: Tribunal Rules No New Evidence Justifies Reopening Under Tax Law, Citing Supreme Court Precedent.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81417</link>
      <description>The crux of the matter revolves around the validity of reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer (AO). The critical issue is whether there existed any new &#039;tangible material&#039; or fresh &#039;information&#039; in the possession of the AO to justify reopening the assessment u/s 147 of the Act. The Tribunal, after examining the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment in Kelvinator of India Ltd. and the assessee&#039;s own case, concluded that there was no new &#039;tangible material&#039; or fresh &#039;information&#039; available with the AO. Consequently, the Tribunal held that if the AO assumes jurisdiction u/s 147 without such material or information, it would render the reassessment proceedings a nullity, liable to be set aside. Additionally, the Tribunal noted that the .....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 08:37:06 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>