<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 837 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758593</link>
    <description>Captive use of oxygen in the manufacture of copper products was treated as eligible for exemption under Notification No. 67/95-CE where sulphuric acid emerged only as an incidental by-product of the process. The analysis followed the settled position that sulphuric acid generated during processing of sulphur dioxide is not the final product of the manufacturing activity, and relied on the principles recognised in Hindustan Zinc and Sterlite Industries. The Tribunal&#039;s factual findings were found consistent with the evidence and not perverse, so the exemption could not be denied merely because the by-product was cleared at nil rate and the duty demand was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2024 18:05:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=768503" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 837 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758593</link>
      <description>Captive use of oxygen in the manufacture of copper products was treated as eligible for exemption under Notification No. 67/95-CE where sulphuric acid emerged only as an incidental by-product of the process. The analysis followed the settled position that sulphuric acid generated during processing of sulphur dioxide is not the final product of the manufacturing activity, and relied on the principles recognised in Hindustan Zinc and Sterlite Industries. The Tribunal&#039;s factual findings were found consistent with the evidence and not perverse, so the exemption could not be denied merely because the by-product was cleared at nil rate and the duty demand was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>