<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 842 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758598</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the impugned order, ruling in favor of the appellant. It concluded that reimbursable expenses should not be included in the taxable value for service tax calculation. The tribunal&#039;s decision was based on a Supreme Court precedent, determining that the department&#039;s demand for service tax on reimbursable expenses was unsustainable. Consequently, the appeal was allowed with consequential reliefs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2024 11:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=768498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 842 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758598</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the impugned order, ruling in favor of the appellant. It concluded that reimbursable expenses should not be included in the taxable value for service tax calculation. The tribunal&#039;s decision was based on a Supreme Court precedent, determining that the department&#039;s demand for service tax on reimbursable expenses was unsustainable. Consequently, the appeal was allowed with consequential reliefs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758598</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>