<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 870 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758626</link>
    <description>The Madras HC disposed of the writ petition by leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue a statutory appeal. It directed that if the appeal is filed within three weeks, the appellate authority must receive it and decide it on merits without raising the issue of limitation. The operative effect is that the petitioner is permitted to seek appellate review, while the limitation objection is excluded if the appeal is presented within the stated period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 08:37:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=768470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 870 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758626</link>
      <description>The Madras HC disposed of the writ petition by leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue a statutory appeal. It directed that if the appeal is filed within three weeks, the appellate authority must receive it and decide it on merits without raising the issue of limitation. The operative effect is that the petitioner is permitted to seek appellate review, while the limitation objection is excluded if the appeal is presented within the stated period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>