<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (8) TMI 18 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38300</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the penalty order imposed for deliberate income concealment, emphasizing the department&#039;s duty to prove cash credits as concealed income. The Court noted conflicting views on the department&#039;s duty when an admission is made by the assessee but ultimately ruled in favor of the revenue. The matter was remanded to the Tribunal to determine if the penalty could be retained only for the specific amount admitted by the assessee as undisclosed income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:36:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (8) TMI 18 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38300</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the penalty order imposed for deliberate income concealment, emphasizing the department&#039;s duty to prove cash credits as concealed income. The Court noted conflicting views on the department&#039;s duty when an admission is made by the assessee but ultimately ruled in favor of the revenue. The matter was remanded to the Tribunal to determine if the penalty could be retained only for the specific amount admitted by the assessee as undisclosed income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>