<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (4) TMI 95 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38299</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled that interest paid for delayed cess payment was not deductible as a business expenditure, as it was considered a penalty and not incidental to business activities. Citing relevant precedents, the court held that penalties for legal breaches in business operations do not qualify as allowable deductions. The decision aligned with established legal principles, rejecting the assessee&#039;s arguments and directing each party to bear their own costs. Judges S. C. DEB and SUDHINDRA MOHAN GUHA concurred on the ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:33:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (4) TMI 95 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38299</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled that interest paid for delayed cess payment was not deductible as a business expenditure, as it was considered a penalty and not incidental to business activities. Citing relevant precedents, the court held that penalties for legal breaches in business operations do not qualify as allowable deductions. The decision aligned with established legal principles, rejecting the assessee&#039;s arguments and directing each party to bear their own costs. Judges S. C. DEB and SUDHINDRA MOHAN GUHA concurred on the ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38299</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>