<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 908 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758664</link>
    <description>The Special Leave Petition was dismissed, but the petitioner was granted liberty to file an appeal against the adjudication order and to raise contentions not specifically decided by the High Court. The petitioner was also protected against dismissal on the ground of limitation, provided the appeal is filed within the stipulated period. The operative effect is that the merits were not reopened in the SLP, while the right to pursue the statutory appeal and argue unresolved issues was preserved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 19:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=768432" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 908 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758664</link>
      <description>The Special Leave Petition was dismissed, but the petitioner was granted liberty to file an appeal against the adjudication order and to raise contentions not specifically decided by the High Court. The petitioner was also protected against dismissal on the ground of limitation, provided the appeal is filed within the stipulated period. The operative effect is that the merits were not reopened in the SLP, while the right to pursue the statutory appeal and argue unresolved issues was preserved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>