<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (9) TMI 13 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38297</link>
    <description>Conversion of a proprietary business into a partnership, with the major son admitted as a partner and minor sons admitted to benefits, was held not to amount to a taxable gift of goodwill. The arrangement was supported by adequate commercial consideration, including capital contribution, the major son&#039;s services, and shared loss-bearing obligations, and the proprietor&#039;s need for assistance in the business. No proprietary asset was transferred to the minor sons without consideration, and the attempt to treat goodwill alone as a gifted asset was rejected. The transaction therefore did not attract gift-tax under the Gift-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:30:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (9) TMI 13 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38297</link>
      <description>Conversion of a proprietary business into a partnership, with the major son admitted as a partner and minor sons admitted to benefits, was held not to amount to a taxable gift of goodwill. The arrangement was supported by adequate commercial consideration, including capital contribution, the major son&#039;s services, and shared loss-bearing obligations, and the proprietor&#039;s need for assistance in the business. No proprietary asset was transferred to the minor sons without consideration, and the attempt to treat goodwill alone as a gifted asset was rejected. The transaction therefore did not attract gift-tax under the Gift-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>