https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457314 Further interrogation in judicial custody was permitted where additional facts emerged during investigation and the earlier opportunity to examine the respondents was not treated as sufficient. The Court held that, when new material justifies further questioning, the investigating agency should be given access despite the respondents' custody status. Taking account of Covid-19 concerns, it limited the examination team to the bare minimum and required the exercise to be completed within two weeks. en-us Tue, 22 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Sep 2024 20:01:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457314 Further interrogation in judicial custody was permitted where additional facts emerged during investigation and the earlier opportunity to examine the respondents was not treated as sufficient. The Court held that, when new material justifies further questioning, the investigating agency should be given access despite the respondents' custody status. Taking account of Covid-19 concerns, it limited the examination team to the bare minimum and required the exercise to be completed within two weeks. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 22 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457314