<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1725 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457320</link>
    <description>The SC concluded that the State Commission&#039;s decree must be fully implemented, setting aside the NCDRC&#039;s order. The appellant&#039;s claim for interest on the balance amount was justified, as the Insurance Company failed to deposit the awarded sum within the specified period. The appeal was allowed, with each party bearing its own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2024 20:01:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=768417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1725 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457320</link>
      <description>The SC concluded that the State Commission&#039;s decree must be fully implemented, setting aside the NCDRC&#039;s order. The appellant&#039;s claim for interest on the balance amount was justified, as the Insurance Company failed to deposit the awarded sum within the specified period. The appeal was allowed, with each party bearing its own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>