<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1697 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457327</link>
    <description>Revision under section 263 was unsustainable where the Assessing Officer had made specific enquiries, examined the contract and supporting records, and accepted the assessee&#039;s position under Article 5(5) of the India-Singapore treaty that services in India were rendered for 102 days, below the treaty threshold. The special treaty rule for services connected with mineral oil exploration, exploitation or extraction prevails over the general fixed-place permanent establishment rule in Article 5(1). Since the assessment was completed on a plausible view after due enquiry, it could not be treated as erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue merely because the Commissioner preferred a different interpretation of the general provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2024 20:01:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=768410" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1697 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457327</link>
      <description>Revision under section 263 was unsustainable where the Assessing Officer had made specific enquiries, examined the contract and supporting records, and accepted the assessee&#039;s position under Article 5(5) of the India-Singapore treaty that services in India were rendered for 102 days, below the treaty threshold. The special treaty rule for services connected with mineral oil exploration, exploitation or extraction prevails over the general fixed-place permanent establishment rule in Article 5(1). Since the assessment was completed on a plausible view after due enquiry, it could not be treated as erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue merely because the Commissioner preferred a different interpretation of the general provision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>