https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457307 Concurrent bail jurisdiction does not permit routine bypass of the Sessions Court for interim protection in aid of anticipatory bail. The settled practice is that the higher forum should ordinarily be approached only after the lower forum has first been moved, unless exceptional circumstances justify direct recourse; none were shown here, so the petitioner was required to seek anticipatory bail before the competent lower court. The petition also became infructuous because the foreign proceedings had been dropped and the passport released, so the immediate grievance no longer survived. en-us Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Sep 2024 11:28:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457307 Concurrent bail jurisdiction does not permit routine bypass of the Sessions Court for interim protection in aid of anticipatory bail. The settled practice is that the higher forum should ordinarily be approached only after the lower forum has first been moved, unless exceptional circumstances justify direct recourse; none were shown here, so the petitioner was required to seek anticipatory bail before the competent lower court. The petition also became infructuous because the foreign proceedings had been dropped and the passport released, so the immediate grievance no longer survived. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457307