<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 762 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758518</link>
    <description>Security could not be demanded under the VAT law for goods in transit where the consignments were supported by invoice, weighment slip, gate pass, import form and trip sheet, and the import details had also been uploaded on the departmental website. The later assessment accepted the sale and purchase documents and finalised the transaction, and no material showed an intent to evade tax. On these facts, the demand of security under Section 48 was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2024 07:59:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=768289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 762 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758518</link>
      <description>Security could not be demanded under the VAT law for goods in transit where the consignments were supported by invoice, weighment slip, gate pass, import form and trip sheet, and the import details had also been uploaded on the departmental website. The later assessment accepted the sale and purchase documents and finalised the transaction, and no material showed an intent to evade tax. On these facts, the demand of security under Section 48 was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>