https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758536 Section 41A did not require a separate notice where the accused was already in judicial custody and the court had authorised interrogation and arrest in another case; the arrest was therefore not illegal on the pleaded procedural grounds. On bail, the Court applied settled liberty-based principles and held that prolonged pre-trial detention, the prosecution's possession of the material, and manageable risks of flight or interference justified regular bail. Filing of the chargesheet did not automatically require relegation to the Trial Court once the High Court had already heard the matter on merits, and procedural delay was not allowed to defeat liberty. The arrest challenge failed, but bail was granted. en-us Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Sep 2024 15:23:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758536 Section 41A did not require a separate notice where the accused was already in judicial custody and the court had authorised interrogation and arrest in another case; the arrest was therefore not illegal on the pleaded procedural grounds. On bail, the Court applied settled liberty-based principles and held that prolonged pre-trial detention, the prosecution's possession of the material, and manageable risks of flight or interference justified regular bail. Filing of the chargesheet did not automatically require relegation to the Trial Court once the High Court had already heard the matter on merits, and procedural delay was not allowed to defeat liberty. The arrest challenge failed, but bail was granted. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758536