<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 793 - MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758549</link>
    <description>Meghalaya HC directed respondent authorities to decide on petitioner&#039;s CGDS account closure application within four weeks of receiving necessary materials. The transfer of income tax jurisdiction from Shillong to Kolkata was no longer contested. The court ordered that proceedings commencement be intimated to petitioner within three weeks, with final orders to follow the four-week timeline for decision-making on the account closure matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2024 07:59:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=768258" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 793 - MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758549</link>
      <description>Meghalaya HC directed respondent authorities to decide on petitioner&#039;s CGDS account closure application within four weeks of receiving necessary materials. The transfer of income tax jurisdiction from Shillong to Kolkata was no longer contested. The court ordered that proceedings commencement be intimated to petitioner within three weeks, with final orders to follow the four-week timeline for decision-making on the account closure matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>