https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758561 An impugned rejection of a claim was challenged for alleged lack of jurisdiction in the issuing authority and failure to consider the relevant contractual clause. With no objection from the respondent to fresh reconsideration, the Court set aside the rejection and directed the competent authority to re-examine the petitioner's representation after notice and hearing. The matter was remanded to the Chief General Manager, BUIDCo for a fresh decision in accordance with law, ensuring the petitioner an opportunity of being heard. en-us Wed, 24 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 11 May 2025 00:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758561 An impugned rejection of a claim was challenged for alleged lack of jurisdiction in the issuing authority and failure to consider the relevant contractual clause. With no objection from the respondent to fresh reconsideration, the Court set aside the rejection and directed the competent authority to re-examine the petitioner's representation after notice and hearing. The matter was remanded to the Chief General Manager, BUIDCo for a fresh decision in accordance with law, ensuring the petitioner an opportunity of being heard. Case-Laws GST Wed, 24 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758561