<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 820 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758576</link>
    <description>An adverse order issued on the same date as the show cause notice was held unsustainable because it denied the affected party a meaningful opportunity to respond. The court found that simultaneous issuance of the notice and the order breached reasonable hearing requirements and procedural fairness. The impugned order was therefore set aside, with liberty to initiate proceedings afresh in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 May 2025 23:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=768231" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 820 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758576</link>
      <description>An adverse order issued on the same date as the show cause notice was held unsustainable because it denied the affected party a meaningful opportunity to respond. The court found that simultaneous issuance of the notice and the order breached reasonable hearing requirements and procedural fairness. The impugned order was therefore set aside, with liberty to initiate proceedings afresh in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758576</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>