<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 826 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758582</link>
    <description>HC quashed tax demand order under GST Act due to procedural irregularities. The court found that tax discrepancies were inadvertent, notices were not physically served, and no personal hearing was provided. HC directed respondent to schedule a hearing, allow petitioner to submit objections, and pass a reasoned order within prescribed timelines, emphasizing principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 19:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=768225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 826 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758582</link>
      <description>HC quashed tax demand order under GST Act due to procedural irregularities. The court found that tax discrepancies were inadvertent, notices were not physically served, and no personal hearing was provided. HC directed respondent to schedule a hearing, allow petitioner to submit objections, and pass a reasoned order within prescribed timelines, emphasizing principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>