<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1504 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457302</link>
    <description>The Calcutta HC dismissed the application for condonation of a 1178-day delay in filing an appeal, rejecting the appellant&#039;s explanations as insufficient. The Court emphasized the necessity of a valid explanation for the entire delay period and underscored the importance of adhering to statutory limitations in filing appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Sep 2024 01:19:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=768208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1504 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457302</link>
      <description>The Calcutta HC dismissed the application for condonation of a 1178-day delay in filing an appeal, rejecting the appellant&#039;s explanations as insufficient. The Court emphasized the necessity of a valid explanation for the entire delay period and underscored the importance of adhering to statutory limitations in filing appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>