<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Charitable society&#039;s cash credits from non-resident donor upheld despite doubts on credibility.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81326</link>
    <description>Charitable society received cash credits from a non-resident individual, offered as taxable income. AO doubted credibility of donor based on his wife&#039;s statement about monthly expenses. ITAT held donor&#039;s non-taxability in separate assessment u/ss 153C and 144 lends credence to transaction. Society&#039;s charitable nature, public utility works undisputed. Mere suspicion based on donor&#039;s association insufficient to treat him as conduit. Wife&#039;s unawareness about donations renders reliance on her statement unjustified. Lack of corroborative evidence from Gupta brothers&#039; search precludes treating donor as conduit. Affidavit possessed by assessee supports donation. Revenue&#039;s grounds rejected, decided in assessee&#039;s favor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2024 08:24:38 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2024 08:24:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=768137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Charitable society&#039;s cash credits from non-resident donor upheld despite doubts on credibility.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81326</link>
      <description>Charitable society received cash credits from a non-resident individual, offered as taxable income. AO doubted credibility of donor based on his wife&#039;s statement about monthly expenses. ITAT held donor&#039;s non-taxability in separate assessment u/ss 153C and 144 lends credence to transaction. Society&#039;s charitable nature, public utility works undisputed. Mere suspicion based on donor&#039;s association insufficient to treat him as conduit. Wife&#039;s unawareness about donations renders reliance on her statement unjustified. Lack of corroborative evidence from Gupta brothers&#039; search precludes treating donor as conduit. Affidavit possessed by assessee supports donation. Revenue&#039;s grounds rejected, decided in assessee&#039;s favor.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2024 08:24:38 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>