<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (1) TMI 16 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38266</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the Income-tax Officer lacked jurisdiction to issue notices under sections 147 and 148 for the assessment years 1965-66 and 1966-67. The writ petition was allowed, quashing the notices, and the respondents were restrained from acting on them. The court also ordered the Income-tax Officer to pay the costs of the assessee-company.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 12:29:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (1) TMI 16 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38266</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the Income-tax Officer lacked jurisdiction to issue notices under sections 147 and 148 for the assessment years 1965-66 and 1966-67. The writ petition was allowed, quashing the notices, and the respondents were restrained from acting on them. The court also ordered the Income-tax Officer to pay the costs of the assessee-company.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>