<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 694 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758450</link>
    <description>Refund of service tax under Notification No. 12/2013-ST is admissible where the underlying services are used for authorized SEZ operations. A transmission line used to carry electricity generated within the SEZ remained part of the authorized operation even though it extended beyond the SEZ area. The existence of DTA-related activity did not by itself defeat the claim, because mere supply of surplus power to the DTA under the SEZ Rules was not treated as a separate business outside the SEZ, especially where no separate DTA unit existed. Prior decisions in the assessee&#039;s own case were followed, and the refund was therefore not denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2024 08:24:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=768113" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 694 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758450</link>
      <description>Refund of service tax under Notification No. 12/2013-ST is admissible where the underlying services are used for authorized SEZ operations. A transmission line used to carry electricity generated within the SEZ remained part of the authorized operation even though it extended beyond the SEZ area. The existence of DTA-related activity did not by itself defeat the claim, because mere supply of surplus power to the DTA under the SEZ Rules was not treated as a separate business outside the SEZ, especially where no separate DTA unit existed. Prior decisions in the assessee&#039;s own case were followed, and the refund was therefore not denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>