https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758459 The Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA dismissed all appeals challenging the Adjudicating Authority's proceedings. The Tribunal rejected the appellant's request for a fresh bench, finding no violation of natural justice principles despite the appellant's claims of institutional bias. The court held that the AA provided adequate reasoning in its orders, though succinctly, and noted the AA operates under strict 180-day time constraints. The Tribunal also dismissed appeals seeking judicial member presence on the bench and supply of "reasons to believe" documents under Section 17(1) PMLA, ruling that such disclosure was not required at the pre-adjudication administrative stage. en-us Tue, 06 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Sep 2024 12:49:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758459 The Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA dismissed all appeals challenging the Adjudicating Authority's proceedings. The Tribunal rejected the appellant's request for a fresh bench, finding no violation of natural justice principles despite the appellant's claims of institutional bias. The court held that the AA provided adequate reasoning in its orders, though succinctly, and noted the AA operates under strict 180-day time constraints. The Tribunal also dismissed appeals seeking judicial member presence on the bench and supply of "reasons to believe" documents under Section 17(1) PMLA, ruling that such disclosure was not required at the pre-adjudication administrative stage. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 06 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758459