https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758461 A woman accused under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act was considered for regular bail in light of the first proviso to section 45, Article 21, the documentary nature of the material, parity with co-accused, and prolonged custody. The Court noted that the benefit for women is not automatic, but must be assessed on the facts, including the strength of the material, the stage of trial, and the likelihood of delay. On those considerations, continued custody was not justified and regular bail was granted. en-us Tue, 10 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Sep 2024 18:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758461 A woman accused under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act was considered for regular bail in light of the first proviso to section 45, Article 21, the documentary nature of the material, parity with co-accused, and prolonged custody. The Court noted that the benefit for women is not automatic, but must be assessed on the facts, including the strength of the material, the stage of trial, and the likelihood of delay. On those considerations, continued custody was not justified and regular bail was granted. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 10 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758461