https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758471 The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dismissed the appeal, affirming its previous decision to set aside the Commissioner's order revoking a Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 2004 (CHALR) license. CESTAT found the Commissioner's conditional revocation pending an inquiry under Regulation 22 to be arbitrary and beyond his authority. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to its directives, noting that the revocation was improperly contingent on an ongoing investigation, contrary to its prior order. Thus, the original revocation order was deemed non-compliant with CHALR regulations, and the license revocation was invalidated. en-us Wed, 11 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Sep 2024 08:24:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758471 The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dismissed the appeal, affirming its previous decision to set aside the Commissioner's order revoking a Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 2004 (CHALR) license. CESTAT found the Commissioner's conditional revocation pending an inquiry under Regulation 22 to be arbitrary and beyond his authority. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to its directives, noting that the revocation was improperly contingent on an ongoing investigation, contrary to its prior order. Thus, the original revocation order was deemed non-compliant with CHALR regulations, and the license revocation was invalidated. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 11 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758471