<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 747 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758503</link>
    <description>Search and seizure under the Income-tax Act requires prior reason to believe and proper application of mind before authorisation is issued, and mere possession of large cash does not by itself establish undisclosed income. Where cash is seized or retained after being handed over by police, the text notes that rival claims may require an interpleader approach and that unauthorized deprivation of property can implicate Article 300-A. It also refers to the proviso to section 132B(1)(i) as providing the administrative procedure for return of seized cash. The special leave petitions were later dismissed as infructuous because compliance had already been made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 15:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=768060" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 747 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758503</link>
      <description>Search and seizure under the Income-tax Act requires prior reason to believe and proper application of mind before authorisation is issued, and mere possession of large cash does not by itself establish undisclosed income. Where cash is seized or retained after being handed over by police, the text notes that rival claims may require an interpleader approach and that unauthorized deprivation of property can implicate Article 300-A. It also refers to the proviso to section 132B(1)(i) as providing the administrative procedure for return of seized cash. The special leave petitions were later dismissed as infructuous because compliance had already been made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>