<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 755 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758511</link>
    <description>The HC quashed detention and penalty orders against a business for E-way Bill non-compliance during the GST transition period. The court found the seizure unjustified, as the Central E-way Bill was available and State E-way Bill requirements were not enforceable from 1.2.2018 to 31.3.2018. The ruling directed refund of any deposited amounts, supporting the petitioner&#039;s challenge to the orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 19:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=768052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 755 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758511</link>
      <description>The HC quashed detention and penalty orders against a business for E-way Bill non-compliance during the GST transition period. The court found the seizure unjustified, as the Central E-way Bill was available and State E-way Bill requirements were not enforceable from 1.2.2018 to 31.3.2018. The ruling directed refund of any deposited amounts, supporting the petitioner&#039;s challenge to the orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758511</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>