https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457284 Regular bail in an alleged economic offence was assessed against the seriousness of the cheating allegations, the scale of the public loss, the applicants' prior conduct, and the risk of influencing witnesses or tampering with evidence. The Delhi HC distinguished the cited bail precedents because the case involved direct cheating of members of the public through a pre-launch residential project scheme, with alleged collection of substantial sums by misrepresentation and suppression of facts. It reiterated that economic offences may require a stricter approach where the allegations indicate deep-rooted conspiracy and deliberate design, and on that basis the bail applications were rejected. en-us Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Sep 2024 08:18:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457284 Regular bail in an alleged economic offence was assessed against the seriousness of the cheating allegations, the scale of the public loss, the applicants' prior conduct, and the risk of influencing witnesses or tampering with evidence. The Delhi HC distinguished the cited bail precedents because the case involved direct cheating of members of the public through a pre-launch residential project scheme, with alleged collection of substantial sums by misrepresentation and suppression of facts. It reiterated that economic offences may require a stricter approach where the allegations indicate deep-rooted conspiracy and deliberate design, and on that basis the bail applications were rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457284