<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 1255 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457277</link>
    <description>A successive bail application will not be entertained without material changed circumstances after an earlier rejection on merits. The Court noted a prima facie role in the post-incident disposal of the deceased&#039;s body, continuing investigation under Section 173(8) CrPC, and the gravity of the allegations. In that setting, the risk of influencing witnesses or obstructing the investigation remained real, so discretionary bail was refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2024 18:03:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=768015" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 1255 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457277</link>
      <description>A successive bail application will not be entertained without material changed circumstances after an earlier rejection on merits. The Court noted a prima facie role in the post-incident disposal of the deceased&#039;s body, continuing investigation under Section 173(8) CrPC, and the gravity of the allegations. In that setting, the risk of influencing witnesses or obstructing the investigation remained real, so discretionary bail was refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>