<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 1411 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457270</link>
    <description>In disciplinary matters involving a disciplined force, dismissal imposed after a duly conducted departmental enquiry will not be interfered with unless the punishment is strikingly disproportionate, perverse or irrational. The fact that the misconduct may fall within a less heinous category under the CRPF Act does not control the propriety of departmental punishment where the proved conduct includes misbehaviour, threats and insubordination. Judicial review is therefore confined to extreme cases of manifest excess. On these principles, the High Court was not justified in setting aside the dismissal or directing reinstatement, and the disciplinary authority&#039;s order stood restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2024 13:55:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 1411 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457270</link>
      <description>In disciplinary matters involving a disciplined force, dismissal imposed after a duly conducted departmental enquiry will not be interfered with unless the punishment is strikingly disproportionate, perverse or irrational. The fact that the misconduct may fall within a less heinous category under the CRPF Act does not control the propriety of departmental punishment where the proved conduct includes misbehaviour, threats and insubordination. Judicial review is therefore confined to extreme cases of manifest excess. On these principles, the High Court was not justified in setting aside the dismissal or directing reinstatement, and the disciplinary authority&#039;s order stood restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>