<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (12) TMI 888 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457265</link>
    <description>Bail granted in a grave offence must be tested against the seriousness of the allegations, the material collected during investigation, the recorded statements under Section 161 CrPC, the risk of tampering with evidence, and the need to secure the accused&#039;s presence at trial. Where the order does not show that these relevant factors were properly weighed, the approach is erroneous. The bail order was quashed and the accused was directed to be taken into custody forthwith.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 18:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (12) TMI 888 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457265</link>
      <description>Bail granted in a grave offence must be tested against the seriousness of the allegations, the material collected during investigation, the recorded statements under Section 161 CrPC, the risk of tampering with evidence, and the need to secure the accused&#039;s presence at trial. Where the order does not show that these relevant factors were properly weighed, the approach is erroneous. The bail order was quashed and the accused was directed to be taken into custody forthwith.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457265</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>