https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758437 The High Court directed the petitioner to pursue the statutory appellate remedy against the GST adjudication confirming tax, interest and penalty on different supplies, rather than adjudicating the writ on merits. Relying on an earlier order in a similar fish-meal matter, the Court allowed the appeal to be filed within the stipulated time and required a 10% pre-deposit on the disputed tax other than the fish-meal demand. The appellate authority was left to decide the appeal, subject to the Supreme Court's pending ruling on fish-meal classification. en-us Fri, 26 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 May 2025 21:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758437 The High Court directed the petitioner to pursue the statutory appellate remedy against the GST adjudication confirming tax, interest and penalty on different supplies, rather than adjudicating the writ on merits. Relying on an earlier order in a similar fish-meal matter, the Court allowed the appeal to be filed within the stipulated time and required a 10% pre-deposit on the disputed tax other than the fish-meal demand. The appellate authority was left to decide the appeal, subject to the Supreme Court's pending ruling on fish-meal classification. Case-Laws GST Fri, 26 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758437