<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 674 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758430</link>
    <description>Where the controversy was covered by the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in M/s VVF Limited and both sides accepted that position, the Gauhati HC held that the impugned order could not be sustained. The writ petition was disposed of by applying the controlling precedent, the order dated 22.06.2017 was set aside and quashed, and the respondents were left free to proceed in accordance with law in terms of that decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 May 2025 23:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767894" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 674 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758430</link>
      <description>Where the controversy was covered by the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in M/s VVF Limited and both sides accepted that position, the Gauhati HC held that the impugned order could not be sustained. The writ petition was disposed of by applying the controlling precedent, the order dated 22.06.2017 was set aside and quashed, and the respondents were left free to proceed in accordance with law in terms of that decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>