<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 648 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758404</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the appeals, ruling that the AMP computation using the Bright Line Test was unsustainable, aligning with the precedent set in Sony Ericson v. CIT. The appeals lacked merit, resulting in the final outcome favoring the respondent&#039;s position against the application of the Bright Line Test.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 08:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767853" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 648 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758404</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the appeals, ruling that the AMP computation using the Bright Line Test was unsustainable, aligning with the precedent set in Sony Ericson v. CIT. The appeals lacked merit, resulting in the final outcome favoring the respondent&#039;s position against the application of the Bright Line Test.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>