<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 646 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758402</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the appeal, affirming the ITAT&#039;s decision to exclude Vishal Information Technologies Ltd. and Nucleus Net soft &amp; GIS (India) Ltd. as comparables for determining the arm&#039;s length price in international transactions. The ITAT&#039;s rationale was based on functional dissimilarities, different business models, and lack of comparable segmental data.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2024 08:31:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 646 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758402</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the appeal, affirming the ITAT&#039;s decision to exclude Vishal Information Technologies Ltd. and Nucleus Net soft &amp; GIS (India) Ltd. as comparables for determining the arm&#039;s length price in international transactions. The ITAT&#039;s rationale was based on functional dissimilarities, different business models, and lack of comparable segmental data.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>