<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 644 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758400</link>
    <description>A co-operative housing society is entitled to deduction under section 80P(2)(d) on interest earned from deposits and balances with another co-operative society. The decisive factor is the legal status of both the recipient and payer as co-operative societies under section 2(19), not the label attached to the payer in common parlance. Section 80P(4) excludes only a claimant assessee that is a co-operative bank and is intended to deny the benefit to co-operative banks functioning like commercial banks. Because the assessee was not a co-operative bank and the payer was shown to be a co-operative society under State law, disallowance under section 80P(4) was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 644 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758400</link>
      <description>A co-operative housing society is entitled to deduction under section 80P(2)(d) on interest earned from deposits and balances with another co-operative society. The decisive factor is the legal status of both the recipient and payer as co-operative societies under section 2(19), not the label attached to the payer in common parlance. Section 80P(4) excludes only a claimant assessee that is a co-operative bank and is intended to deny the benefit to co-operative banks functioning like commercial banks. Because the assessee was not a co-operative bank and the payer was shown to be a co-operative society under State law, disallowance under section 80P(4) was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>