<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 634 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758390</link>
    <description>Where sales are accepted and only purchases are disputed as bogus, the addition is ordinarily confined to the profit element embedded in the disputed purchases rather than the full purchase value. The assessee had produced trading records and the sales were not disturbed, so the disputed purchases were treated as warranting only an estimated gross profit addition. The addition was restricted to 6.19% of the disputed purchases, giving the assessee partial relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2024 08:31:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 634 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758390</link>
      <description>Where sales are accepted and only purchases are disputed as bogus, the addition is ordinarily confined to the profit element embedded in the disputed purchases rather than the full purchase value. The assessee had produced trading records and the sales were not disturbed, so the disputed purchases were treated as warranting only an estimated gross profit addition. The addition was restricted to 6.19% of the disputed purchases, giving the assessee partial relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>